A growing trend within the world of academia is the additional use of and dependence on adjunct professors. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines an adjunct professor as “a teacher ranking next below a professor.” Adjunct professors are college professors who are hired to teach specific courses for a designated length of time. According to Collegefactual.com, colleges and universities across the United States employ full-time professors fifty-one percent of the time, and Eastern University has a teaching faculty comprised of thirty percent full-time professors and seventy percent adjunct or part-time professors.

One of Eastern University’s mission statements asserts, “We maintain a high priority on excellence in teaching within the context of exemplary scholarship and research.” However, PBS states the average yearly income for adjunct professors is $25,000, which does not include health benefits or job security. Due to the low salary and lack of health benefits, adjunct professors are often required to work multiple jobs in order to make a decent income and provide themselves with health benefits. The need to juggle multiple jobs can cause the professors to stretch themselves thin, which means students are not always receiving the attention they are paying for, nor the attention they need to find academic success. Adjunct professors are typically provided a temporary office space for the days they spend teaching on campus. The office provided usually lacks the phone, computer, and office storage full-time professors are provided. So, students having courses with adjunct professors are cheated of ample office hours to ask questions. Hence, it is difficult to comprehend how a school with a staff consisting of mostly adjunct or part-time professors is able to provide students with excellent teaching.

While many note the difficulties of being an adjunct, some see advantages. Adjunct professors receive benefits that full-time professors do not. Most adjunct professors teach at multiple universities, which allows them to connect with an additional range of students. Being an adjunct professor can sometimes allow them to have a bit more flexibility in their schedule than a typical professor has. Finally, an adjunct professor is able to pursue other career opportunities, while being able to still pursue teaching. Several college professors work on publishing books or starting additional businesses, which can be difficult while teaching full-time.

Adjunct professors at Eastern University experience the positive and the negative aspects of the job. The school has a large amount of adjunct and part-time professors, but a small sample has agreed to share their feelings on the highly debated position. Professor Brienne Menut and Dr. Christopher McGrath are Eastern University adjunct instructors, who have each had an unique experience with some similarities.

To begin, Menut is an Eastern University alum; she teaches at three other colleges, and spends ample time driving to different campuses. Menut compared being an adjunct professor to being a “freelance educator.” She is able to create her own schedule and connect with multiple sets of students. New information and trends gathered from the various campuses where she teaches provide Menut with new ideas and concepts to share with other classes. While Menut appreciates the positive aspects of being an adjunct professor, she hopes to eventually become a full-time professor, which would provide her with the health benefits and office space she is currently lacking. She notes that Eastern University provides her with the lowest income, which, as she states, “seems odd, considering Eastern’s striving for faith, reason, and, particularly, justice. “

Unlike Menut, another Eastern Univesity professor, who remains anonymous, teaches at one other school and has a full-time job outside of teaching. They stated, “[I] had to get a full time job outside education, and get an additional teaching position to make ends meet [and provide myself with benefits].” Furthermore, when asked if they felt adjunct instructors receive the same opportunity and respect as full time professors, they responded, “No, not at all. There is no way anyone can convince me that adjunct professors get the same respect, opportunities, etc. as full time professors.”

Dr. Christopher McGrath is an adjunct professor at Eastern University, who teaches at four other universities part-time and one other university full-time. Dr. McGrath says, “ I started off part time to build my experience to get a full-time job.” However, Dr. McGrath enjoys teaching so much that he continues to teach at multiple schools and levels. There are very few complaints from Dr. McGrath about his role as an adjunct professor other than his time spent traveling and the requirements of learning multiple school policies. These professors share a similar experience, while each having a distinctive perspective.

The debate of adjunct teachers is growing in the academic world and with the professors themselves. Certainly, this trend is growing at all institutions, but the effects may be going beyond the professors and to the students. It seems that as education is becoming more costly, the choices of institutions keep diminishing the importance of full-time professors.

Thankfulness is often expressed in passing or with words. Reading about those less fortunate may invoke a silent expression or prayer of thankfulness for all that you have. Or perhaps looking out the window on a cold, rainy day may cause a sensation of gratitude for the roof overhead. Maybe thankfulness is quickly mumbled before taking a bite of a delicious meal. People seem to naturally express gratitude in thought or by spoken words, but it might be better expressed through a more tangible medium that requires very little time or money.

1. Giving back to those less fortunate is a tangible and productive way to show how thankful you are for all that you have. Expressing to yourself or verbalizing how thankful you are for your belongings is an empty expression. To truly show how grateful you are, donate your time volunteering at a nonprofit thrift shop, or donate clothes to those who may not have the means to buy new ones through groups like the American Red Cross, who will then distribute them to the victims of natural disasters.

2. While snuggled up in a blanket watching the rain patter against the window, it is easy to be thankful for the shelter that guards you against the elements. However, simply muttering appreciation does not truly display the feeling nor does it help those who are suffering. Spending a few hours volunteering at a homeless shelter can be a way to turn your abstract thankfulness into a tangible appreciation. Helping those who are currently unable to provide themselves with shelter can display how thankful you truly are. Valley Forge REACT is an emergency shelter that also provides food and clothing to the families that seek its refuge, and it is always looking for volunteers to help the shelter run smoothly and give the customers the help they need.

3. How wonderful is it to sit down to a warm meal that is destined to be delicious? Now, imagine never having anyone to prepare a hot meal for you nor the means to make one yourself. This grim thought instantly sparks gratitude, but it should also inspire action. Finding time to make a hot meal for someone puts your thankfulness into a constructive action. Volunteering at your local food pantry or soup kitchen will directly help those in your community who are unable to provide themselves with food.

4. Volunteering is an excellent way to show thankfulness for all that you have been blessed with. However, you can also express gratitude through small daily acts. A smile, a “thank you,” or a small gesture, such as a handwritten note or a phone call to let someone know they are on your mind, are simple ways to display thankfulness and kindness each day.

Thankfulness is a sentiment that can easily be seen as empty. Volunteering is a great way to express the gratitude that you feel and, in many cases, will increase it by volumes.

The World Series is the pinnacle of baseball’s 162-game season, and this year the battle for the best team took place between a band of misfits, the San Francisco Giants, and America’s team, the Kansas City Royals.

Game one seemed to be established in the first inning of the game. Pablo Sandoval’s RBI double started the Giant’s offense, which scored three runs in the first inning. Adding to the offense, Hunter Pence hit a two run home run in the first inning allowing the Giants to lead by three early. For the Royals, Salvador Perez hit a solo homerun and gave them their only run in the seventh inning. The Giants started off Game One with offense and Bumgarner secured their win with impeccable defense; the final score was Giants,7, and Royals, 5.

Game two did not start out with gripping offense. Game two was tied at two by the fourth inning. This game settled into monotony until the sixth inning. An RBI single by Billy Butler changed the entire game. Butler’s single headed off a Royals’ five-run rally, which was then maintained by their bullpen. The sixth inning also sparked a bench clearing by both teams after the Giants’ Strickland scoffed at the Royals’ Perez. No serious fighting took place, but Strickland was escorted to his dugout by an umpire. Game Two tied the series at a game each.

Game Three fully displayed the unorthodoxy of Royals’ manager Ned Yost. Yost was criticized for being a hothead who made questionable calls. However, he certainly seemed to know what he was doing in Game Three at AT&T Park. Yost rearranged his batting order, put in a player who did not start in a game for five weeks, and allowed a pitcher with more losses than wins to pitch the first five innings. During the game, Yost encouraged a questionable situation: he allowed Royals’ pitcher Kelvin Herrera to bat for the first time in his career. The radical coaching calls in Game Three allowed the Royals to take the lead in the World Series, making the series Royals 2, Giants 1.

Game Four was a full demonstration of the Giant’s offense and defense. Though the Giants’ starting pitcher, Ryan Vogelsong, only lasted three innings, reliever, Yusmeiro Petit, got the win with his three scoreless innings pitched. The Giants’ offense, which had been ineffective in the prior two games, became explosive. Hunter Pence, Pablo Sandoval, and Joe Panik went 7 for 14 in Game Four. The Royals were leading the Giants until the fifth inning when Pence hit an RBI single off Royals reliever Jason Frasor, and Juan Perez hit a sacrifice fly that scored Pence. Sandoval put his team in the lead with his two run double. San Francisco kept up with their explosive offense, beating the Royals 11 to 4 and tying the series.

Game Five was a quiet one for the Royals who were shut out by Giants’ pitcher Madison Bumgarner. Bumgarner pitched nine straight scoreless innings for the pivotal fifth game of the series, and he became the first pitcher since 2003 to pitch a shutout. Hunter Pence also kept up his impressive offense going 9 for 19 in the five games so far. Bumgarner made history and the Giants now led the series 3 to 2.

Game Six consisted of another great show of pitching, but this time it was the Royals starter, Yordano Ventura, who pitched seven shutout innings and allowed only three hits. The Royals scored 7 runs in the first inning and did not relent. In the bottom of the seventh inning, Royals third baseman Mike Moustakas hit a homer, ending the series’ three game homerun drought. The Royals shutout the Giants in their 10 to 0 win forcing the ever exciting game seven.

Game seven culminates the end of season and the end of the Fall Classic. The Giants scored two runs in the second inning. Game seven was tied at two until the fourth inning when Pablo Sandoval, Hunter Pence, and Michael Morse all hit singles; Morse hit in the winning run. After that it was the battle of the bullpens. Bumgarner entered the game in the fifth inning immediately getting two outs. Bumgarner pitched 68 powerful pitches, clinched the World Series for the San Francisco Giants, and was the series MVP.

The Islamic State has been constantly growing in force and number since their first emergence. Social media has been a major factor in the recruiting of new members, and recently there have been hundreds of French youths, particularly females, joining ISIS. The new onslaught of young women leaving home for ISIS came as a shock to their families and French officials. However, those back in France did not receive as large a shock as those French youth now in Syria.

ISIS has been utilizing the power and span of social media to lure new female recruits to Syria. So far, there has been a Facebook connection between the young French women and an ISIS member in each of the identified new members. The Guardian Liberty Voice believes that the lure of ISIS for the French youth is a fantasy; ISIS members make promises that the women will be loved by a husband from the group, taken care of by the community, and receive some type of compensation for any children they bear. One French woman, Sahra Ali Mehenni, left her home when she was 18. Sahra had reportedly withdrew from her family into her room, where she had access to a computer. The Huffington Post reports she had isolated herself for nearly six months before her family was able to convince her to go to school. A few weeks later she asked her mother to help her get her passport, and then on March 11 she left for Syria. Shortly after her arrival, Sahra was married to a 25 year old man. Sahra has been able to speak to her parents since her arrival in Syria, but they feel her dialogue is being scripted by ISIS. However, Sahra insists she is happy and leading the same life as she once had in France.

Despite Sahra and other women’s insistence they are happy, a woman who escaped from ISIS described the tragedies she experienced while being an ISIS member. The woman now calls herself Khadija to protect herself; she originally joined ISIS after meeting and talking with a member online. He convinced her to join an all-female ISIS group, where she was responsible for making sure other women on the street were wearing the correct loose fitting Islamic garb. But Khadija witnessed extreme brutalities: she watched the crucifixion of a young boy, oversaw countless women whipped for minor discrepancies in their clothing, and shuddered at the extreme sexual abuse she knew she could not escape. The promise of a life filled with meaning and love deteriorated in front of her, and Khadija escaped just before she was to be married off to a man different than the one she met online.

Cunning lies and abuse to young women is another atrocity to be added to ISIS’s list. Numerous young French women have joined ISIS looking for the love, honor and heroism they were promised, but if Khadija’s account was true, the women are experiencing a horrific surprise.

Sources: CNN, Huffington Post, Newser.com, GuardianLV.com

Scroll to Top